tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20435429.post5185262055017035476..comments2023-10-20T08:03:50.579-05:00Comments on Blogging While Feminist: The worst review ever.Plain(s)feministhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15056404699624958898noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20435429.post-75893221930442283192009-02-06T17:00:00.000-06:002009-02-06T17:00:00.000-06:00Thanks for commenting and for giving more of a con...Thanks for commenting and for giving more of a context to the review. I didn't even notice this theme (!) of him reacting to "womanly things" because 1) I haven't seen the play and am not familiar with it, and 2) I was distracted by how nasty the review was. I'm really sorry you guys had to deal with that. I'm going to tell my Women's Studies class about this.Plain(s)feministhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15056404699624958898noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20435429.post-53470440316711995462009-02-06T14:21:00.000-06:002009-02-06T14:21:00.000-06:00Actually, it's interesting that you commented on t...Actually, it's interesting that you commented on this review on a site called "Blogging While Feminist," because a lot of the reviewer's issues with the play revolve around the fact that it deals with the issues of a housewife - "dishwater problems" - and his condescending tone really give the whole thing an icky feel. A lot of women who've seen this play respond very differently than he did, but then again, I don't think he's the intended audience.<BR/>Now, I'm involved with the production, so I'm not an unbiased source, but man, he was mean, and I don't think the play would have gotten half the ire it did from him if it hadn't been so rooted in "womanly things." It's worth checking out for those who find the subject matter relatable.Rachel Teaglehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02238129202110063751noreply@blogger.com